This is a wiki for a reason. Anyone can contribute. If you see something that is inaccurate or can be improved, don't ask that it be fixed--just improve it.
[ Disclaimer, Create new user --- Wiki markup help, Install P99 ]

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Statistics"

From Project 1999 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
Classic Agi bonus from Torven of TAKP. While this is classic it is currently not used on p1999.
+
Edited the Primary and Secondary statistics for project accuracy albeit I am still unsatisfied with ATK as we have no dev comments on it's workings. The information provided is based on in game testing and referenced against live/EQEMU. However I am unable to model what's going exactly on under the hood. For instance I can use a character with high Offense but no Weapon Skill. However the reverse is not so easy. In theory and practice this provides some difficulty. Also removed the blurbs which were after Brad's quotes which just restated what was already said. I believe this will make those sections flow better. - Caiu 02/09/2019
[[File:Agibonus.PNG]]
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Edited the Primary and Secondary statistics for project accuracy albeit I am still unsatisfied with ATK as we have no dev comments on it's workings. The information provided is based on in game testing and referenced against live/EQEMU. However I am unable to model what's going on under the hood. For instance I can use a character with high Offense but no Weapon Skill. However the reverse is not so easy. In theory this presents an issue but not in practice. Also removed the blurbs which were after Brad's quotes which just restated what was already said. I believe this will make those sections flow better. - Caiu 02/06/2019
+

Revision as of 09:15, 9 February 2019

Edited the Primary and Secondary statistics for project accuracy albeit I am still unsatisfied with ATK as we have no dev comments on it's workings. The information provided is based on in game testing and referenced against live/EQEMU. However I am unable to model what's going exactly on under the hood. For instance I can use a character with high Offense but no Weapon Skill. However the reverse is not so easy. In theory and practice this provides some difficulty. Also removed the blurbs which were after Brad's quotes which just restated what was already said. I believe this will make those sections flow better. - Caiu 02/09/2019