This is a wiki for a reason. Anyone can contribute. If you see something that is inaccurate or can be improved, don't ask that it be fixed--just improve it.
[ Disclaimer, Create new user --- Wiki markup help, Install P99 ]

User talk:Kaejer

From Project 1999 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Spellicon H.png This is a Discussion/Talk Area for a page

Create a ==New Section== for each topic

Sign each comment by using 4x tildes (~~~~)

Feel free to leave messages/topics of potential improvement of the wiki with header tags.

The Wiki is not designed for long conversations, so if you need to talk with me longer than 1 or 2 replies, message me on the forums or in the game.
Do not edit other people's messages on this page.



Hi, thanks for your high-quality additions and edits to the wiki. I've made you an admin, among other things you can edit templates, the main page, etc. You can also edit/delete auction tracker prices (see "ADMIN" link on individual item pages).

--Ravhin (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh wow thanks, didn't even know that could be a possibility. I'll be sure to edit stuff for the greater good! - Kaejer 08:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Loly Taa

Can we talk? I am the real Loly Taa of TMO. I am not misreporting anything. It's time to tell the truth.

Removed the personal info from the page, misreporting what? I'm not sure what you are talking about. - Kaejer 07:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Potential Problematic User:Burtmacklin

I caught a recent edit by this user Special:Contributions/Burtmacklin which was an inappropriate comment. Since you're the active admin I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'd normally do this sort of thing via a PM on the forums but I don't know your username there. I undid their edit but I think it may be worth a quick browse of their past edits, they seem to like removing things.

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on him. I don't see any other major issues at the moment. - Kaejer 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Problematic User:Revnan

Editing this section to a summary rather than a giant wall of text that it didn't need to be. Baler (talk) had a concern about Revnan (talk)'s method of editing the Wiki due to issues with objectivity. Try to keep Wiki pages as objective as possible unless it is in a Player Guide, then write whatever you want. If you are found to be deleting entire sections of pages rather than improving, you will likely be blocked from editing the Wiki.


The summary is above user got banned because they made a secondary account to delete out content. This user removed the content that was shown on this page, but at this point, any account associated with Revnan, Laydia, or Revnant should be watched carefully in order to avoid future issues with incorrect information and deleting content. If it happens again, all accounts that seem to be linked will be blocked without notice. Feel free to message me through the forums or in game if you want to actually talk about this rather than rage deleting content.

Era Templates

Thanks for catching that issue with the Chardok Revamp template; I've corrected it.

--Loramin (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Awesome, hope it was an easy fix!

--Kaejer (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the Chardok template, that's all working as intended (or at least as best as possible).

The era category pages uses its own template, "Era Row" (Template:Era_Row), and that template gets mad if I try and stick logic (like "if this is Chardok, add Revamp" logic) inside that one section of it (too much nested logic inside a link or something).

However, as you noted, everything still works with the no-"Revamp" version, because of the redirects :)

--Loramin (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

In terms of having a way to find all pages without an era ... unfortunately that just isn't possible. You can find pages without any category at all, or you can use the Mult-Category search to find pages with 2+ categories, but there's no way (that I know of) to search for the lack of a category (or in this case categories). Sorry.

--Loramin (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


I keep removing it because adding a comment every time an item changes hands doesn't add any value, and just clutters the page. The Briefs comment was at least a server event and I feel like that's notable enough to warrant it's addition, but just saying "Soandso has given away/sold his SoD's" isn't really noteworthy and if an addition was added for each instance of this happening the page would look terrible. Toggin (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I think putting it all in the discussion tab is a decent idea, also those SoD's change hands more than you think it's just never been posted on the wiki before.

--Toggin (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)