This is a wiki for a reason. Anyone can contribute. If you see something that is inaccurate or can be improved, don't ask that it be fixed--just improve it.
[ Disclaimer, Create new user --- Wiki markup help, Install P99 ]

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kaejer"

From Project 1999 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Blocks)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Feel free to leave messages/topics of potential improvement of the wiki with header tags.<br>
+
{{Talk}}Feel free to leave messages/topics of potential improvement of the wiki with header tags.<br>
 +
The Wiki is not designed for long conversations, so if you need to talk with me longer than 1 or 2 replies, message me on the forums or in the game.<br>
 
<b>Do not edit other people's messages on this page.</b>
 
<b>Do not edit other people's messages on this page.</b>
  
Line 16: Line 17:
 
:Removed the personal info from the page, misreporting what? I'm not sure what you are talking about. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 07:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 
:Removed the personal info from the page, misreporting what? I'm not sure what you are talking about. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 07:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
  
== Potential Problematic User ==
+
== Potential Problematic User:Burtmacklin ==
 
I caught a recent edit by this user [[Special:Contributions/Burtmacklin]] which was an inappropriate comment. Since you're the active admin I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'd normally do this sort of thing via a PM on the forums but I don't know your username there. I undid their edit but I think it may be worth a quick browse of their past edits, they seem to like removing things.
 
I caught a recent edit by this user [[Special:Contributions/Burtmacklin]] which was an inappropriate comment. Since you're the active admin I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'd normally do this sort of thing via a PM on the forums but I don't know your username there. I undid their edit but I think it may be worth a quick browse of their past edits, they seem to like removing things.
  
Line 25: Line 26:
  
 
== Blocks ==
 
== Blocks ==
 +
The summary is above user got banned because they made a secondary account to delete out content. This user removed the content that was shown on this page, but at this point, any account associated with Revnan, Laydia, or Revnant should be watched carefully in order to avoid future issues with incorrect information and deleting content. If it happens again, all accounts that seem to be linked will be blocked without notice. Feel free to message me through the forums or in game if you want to actually talk about this rather than rage deleting content.
  
Sudden blocks without cause are not at all decent, nor is taking credit for my work. Email:runicknight@gmail.com so we can sort this out. Or at the very least revert or remove all my contributions and we will add to the community somewhere else. To criticize us and then steal the work of our group is awful.
+
== Era Templates ==
:I'm assuming you're Revnan, which Revnan is not blocked. At least not by me, I haven't seen if another admin blocked you. Also, I don't know what work you're talking about, it's a Wiki. There's literally a history page that shows people who contributed what. There's also an entire search of contributions you can see what people did to any page they have edited. People see something someone else did and if they see an improvement they do it. The only person I blocked today was Laydia, who went through a bunch of content and deleted it all. Deleting content is not an acceptable contribution to the Wiki. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 23:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+
Thanks for catching that issue with the Chardok Revamp template; I've corrected it.
:I take it back, it looks like the block function on the Wiki is capable of banning IPs, so it was able to tell that Laydia was the same IP as you and blocked both Revnan and Laydia accounts. I would recommend to just never edit this Wiki again because you have very clear misunderstandings of how things work with a Wiki. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 23:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+
  
 +
--[[User:Loramin|Loramin]] ([[User talk:Loramin|talk]]) 17:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  
Revnan was blocked by Baler first, there was no dual blocking.  He made 4 alterations to my account today. I was merely removing our contributions as they weren't what you wanted. Not random deletions, but the work I personally did. I have a right to that. And you have a right to rewrite them how you see fit. We could have done this in a civil matter, I have no idea where all the knee jerking came from.  he made 4 alterations to my account today. I couldn't even modify my own information. Please explain how they work, I have been asking questions this whole time to learn.
+
:Awesome, hope it was an easy fix!
 +
--[[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] ([[User talk:Kaejer|talk]]) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  
 +
Regarding the Chardok template, that's all working as intended (or at least as best as possible).
  
Honestly, go back to the beginning and see what it must be like to put work in and have it lambasted, to ask questions and to be tossed around and slammed. How would you have reacted if your first few entries were treated the same?
+
The era category pages uses its own template, "Era Row" ([[Template:Era_Row]]), and that template gets mad if I try and stick logic (like "if this is Chardok, add Revamp" logic) inside that one section of it (too much nested logic inside a link or something).
:I was civil at first, but you turned this into a shitstorm real quick and I don't understand why. I liked your new formatting for the information, but the problem was you cut out too much information that was relevant to the topic and then added your own personal reviews of stats. A Player Guide would have been massively better to show what your opinions were of the stats for each class and would have been welcomed.
+
I was merely removing our contributions.
+
"Your contributions" were based on content that has been on those pages for longer than your account has existed. I've already changed some of what you did because it was omitting out important information that formerly was there. Let's just both drop it and go back to our daily lives at this point. Do not delete content off of this Wiki. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 23:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+
I see now that Baler is the one who blocked me, he made 4 alterations to my account today.
+
I don't see Baler as an admin. If he was an admin, he wouldn't have to come to me for help with some of the issues he had with your contributions. - [[User:Kaejer|Kaejer]] 23:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
+
  
At this point just message me on the Forums or in game and we can have a conversation rather than editing a Wiki page that isn't designed for this kind of back and forth. My information is at the top of my user page.
+
However, as you noted, everything still works with the no-"Revamp" version, because of the redirects :)
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Loramin|Loramin]] ([[User talk:Loramin|talk]]) 15:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
In terms of having a way to find all pages without an era ... unfortunately that just isn't possible.  You can find pages without any category at all, or you can use the Mult-Category search to find pages with 2+ categories, but there's no way (that I know of) to search for the lack of a category (or in this case categories).  Sorry.
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Loramin|Loramin]] ([[User talk:Loramin|talk]]) 04:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== SoD ==
 +
 
 +
I keep removing it because adding a comment every time an item changes hands doesn't add any value, and just clutters the page. The Briefs comment was at least a server event and I feel like that's notable enough to warrant it's addition, but just saying "Soandso has given away/sold his SoD's" isn't really noteworthy and if an addition was added for each instance of this happening the page would look terrible.  
 +
[[User:Toggin|Toggin]] ([[User talk:Toggin|talk]]) 11:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
I think putting it all in the discussion tab is a decent idea, also those SoD's change hands more than you think it's just never been posted on the wiki before.
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Toggin|Toggin]] ([[User talk:Toggin|talk]]) 21:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:25, 6 May 2022

Spellicon H.png This is a Discussion/Talk Area for a page


Create a ==New Section== for each topic

Sign each comment by using 4x tildes (~~~~)

Feel free to leave messages/topics of potential improvement of the wiki with header tags.

The Wiki is not designed for long conversations, so if you need to talk with me longer than 1 or 2 replies, message me on the forums or in the game.
Do not edit other people's messages on this page.

Contents

Admin

Hi, thanks for your high-quality additions and edits to the wiki. I've made you an admin, among other things you can edit templates, the main page, etc. You can also edit/delete auction tracker prices (see "ADMIN" link on individual item pages).

--Ravhin (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh wow thanks, didn't even know that could be a possibility. I'll be sure to edit stuff for the greater good! - Kaejer 08:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Loly Taa

Can we talk? I am the real Loly Taa of TMO. I am not misreporting anything. It's time to tell the truth.

Removed the personal info from the page, misreporting what? I'm not sure what you are talking about. - Kaejer 07:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Potential Problematic User:Burtmacklin

I caught a recent edit by this user Special:Contributions/Burtmacklin which was an inappropriate comment. Since you're the active admin I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'd normally do this sort of thing via a PM on the forums but I don't know your username there. I undid their edit but I think it may be worth a quick browse of their past edits, they seem to like removing things.

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on him. I don't see any other major issues at the moment. - Kaejer 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Problematic User:Revnan

Editing this section to a summary rather than a giant wall of text that it didn't need to be. Baler (talk) had a concern about Revnan (talk)'s method of editing the Wiki due to issues with objectivity. Try to keep Wiki pages as objective as possible unless it is in a Player Guide, then write whatever you want. If you are found to be deleting entire sections of pages rather than improving, you will likely be blocked from editing the Wiki.

Blocks

The summary is above user got banned because they made a secondary account to delete out content. This user removed the content that was shown on this page, but at this point, any account associated with Revnan, Laydia, or Revnant should be watched carefully in order to avoid future issues with incorrect information and deleting content. If it happens again, all accounts that seem to be linked will be blocked without notice. Feel free to message me through the forums or in game if you want to actually talk about this rather than rage deleting content.

Era Templates

Thanks for catching that issue with the Chardok Revamp template; I've corrected it.

--Loramin (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Awesome, hope it was an easy fix!

--Kaejer (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the Chardok template, that's all working as intended (or at least as best as possible).

The era category pages uses its own template, "Era Row" (Template:Era_Row), and that template gets mad if I try and stick logic (like "if this is Chardok, add Revamp" logic) inside that one section of it (too much nested logic inside a link or something).

However, as you noted, everything still works with the no-"Revamp" version, because of the redirects :)

--Loramin (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

In terms of having a way to find all pages without an era ... unfortunately that just isn't possible. You can find pages without any category at all, or you can use the Mult-Category search to find pages with 2+ categories, but there's no way (that I know of) to search for the lack of a category (or in this case categories). Sorry.

--Loramin (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

SoD

I keep removing it because adding a comment every time an item changes hands doesn't add any value, and just clutters the page. The Briefs comment was at least a server event and I feel like that's notable enough to warrant it's addition, but just saying "Soandso has given away/sold his SoD's" isn't really noteworthy and if an addition was added for each instance of this happening the page would look terrible. Toggin (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I think putting it all in the discussion tab is a decent idea, also those SoD's change hands more than you think it's just never been posted on the wiki before.

--Toggin (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)