This is a wiki for a reason. Anyone can contribute. If you see something that is inaccurate or can be improved, don't ask that it be fixed--just improve it.
[ Disclaimer, Create new user --- Wiki markup help, Install P99 ]

User talk:Kaejer

From Project 1999 Wiki
Revision as of 13:40, 9 December 2020 by Baler (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Feel free to leave messages/topics of potential improvement of the wiki with header tags.

Admin

Hi, thanks for your high-quality additions and edits to the wiki. I've made you an admin, among other things you can edit templates, the main page, etc. You can also edit/delete auction tracker prices (see "ADMIN" link on individual item pages).

--Ravhin (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh wow thanks, didn't even know that could be a possibility. I'll be sure to edit stuff for the greater good! - Kaejer 08:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Loly Taa

Can we talk? I am the real Loly Taa of TMO. I am not misreporting anything. It's time to tell the truth.

Removed the personal info from the page, misreporting what? I'm not sure what you are talking about. - Kaejer 07:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Potential Problematic Users

I caught a recent edit by this user Special:Contributions/Burtmacklin which was an inappropriate comment. Since you're the active admin I just wanted to give you a heads up. I'd normally do this sort of thing via a PM on the forums but I don't know your username there. I undid their edit but I think it may be worth a quick browse of their past edits, they seem to like removing things.

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on him. I don't see any other major issues at the moment. - Kaejer 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


Another user that is making large changes to class pages. Special:Contributions/Revnan

At first I was excited to see some improvements to class pages but the more edits this person does the more non-objective they're becoming. They're in fact removing information in favor of their opinion. I really don't know how this should be handled. Their motives seem good but the edits will dramatically affect how people make decisions about the class(es). --Baler (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

In fact they outright deleted a section on the wizard page. https://wiki.project1999.com/index.php?title=Wizard&diff=prev&oldid=292757

If they didn't put in so much effort to change the text I'd wonder if they were a troll. --Baler (talk) 20:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I think they're just a very opinionated person and were annoyed at an anecdote about neckbeards when explaining min/max reasonings on the Enchanter section. I tried to merge the old and the new to a shorter version that still has all of the useful information. The Wizard one I undid because it was just deleting out a lot of stuff. Improve, not remove. - Kaejer 22:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I agree with you on your assessment. The problem is he's misleading people with information that's more fit for a player guide. Making bold changes to a class page dramatically affects how thousands of people decide on that class. I'm not against revnan improving the wiki but I am against non-objective information. He even uses terms like "I" and "my" in his edits which directly shows he's pushing his opinion onto the page. He doesn't know how the wiki works or the flow of the wiki. I've tried to communicate through talking on his discussion page and he responds in the middle of my talk page. This shows he lacks the basic foundation of how the wiki works. I just want someone to talk to him and get a feel for if he's a problematic user or a valuable contributor. --Baler (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)